XI
THEORY/PRAXIS COURSE
(In
collaboration with the Department of English,
Goa
University
)
June 17 – July 13, 2013
Venue:
The Department of English,
Goa
University
The
Forum on Contemporary Theory has been conducting an intensive course in
Theory/Praxis since 2003 for the benefit of scholars across disciplines
interested in new developments in Theory and their application. The Course
includes intensive textual readings in specific areas, supported by
seminars and talks on broader but related issues. The Course will be held
in collaboration with the Department of English,
Goa
University
in
Goa
during 17 June – 13 July, 2013.
COURSE
OUTLINES
The Course is organized around the
following topics to be discussed in-depth by the core faculty, supported
by public lectures and mini-seminars by the invited scholars.
1)
Modernity, Democracy, and the Politics of Disorder
(Faculty: Dilip Gaonkar) June 18 - June 22, 2013
There
is a deep and abiding anxiety about the collective political agency of the
people, the demos, in the Western social and political thought and
discourse. It begins with the Plato’s image of the demos as the great
beast which the rhetor (the oratorically gifted political actor)
mistakenly believes that he can manipulate, mobilize and manage to realize
his ends. According to Plato, irrespective of whether the ends sought by
the rhetor are those of personal aggrandizement or of common good (often
confused in the minds of actors such as Alcibiades), he is doomed to fail
because in the long run the direction of influence is reversed—the
manipulator becomes the manipulated, the seducer is seduced. Ideally,
Plato would prefer to exclude the people as a collective political agent
altogether. However, Aristotle realized that even in a mixed
constitutional polity the agency of the popular classes has to be
acknowledged because they are the primary source of political legitimacy,
if not the sole source of sovereignty that they were destined to become
with the near universal acceptance of the doctrine of popular sovereignty
at the onset of modernity, especially after the great revolutions of the
late 18th century.
The
acceptance of the doctrine of popular sovereignty does not significantly
lessen the anxiety about the demos among the elites, especially among
intellectual elites. A series of ideological and institutional strategies
are put into play to discipline and neutralize the demos with partial
success. However, the disruptive presence of the people in their
collective capacity as the political crowd, which is often denounced as
mob or as multitude, simply cannot be made to disappear.
The
objective of this week-long intensive workshop is to chart the trajectory
of this persistent strain of anti-democratic thought, disguised as crowd
theory (actually anti-crowd theory), within the Western intellectual
tradition. This workshop is not being offered as an exercise in
intellectual history. The workshop seeks to accomplish two goals: First,
the workshop will seek to explore and determine to what extent the
non-Western intellectuals, including the nationalist and the post-colonial
intellectuals in the global south, have been drawn to and seduced by this
tradition of hostility and suspicion directed at the demos, imagined and
feared as the collective political agent. Second, the workshop will seek
to attend to and assess the significance of the unmistakable emergence of
people, as evident from their repeated gatherings in streets and squares
in everywhere, especially in the global south.
Workshop
Schedule
June
18:
Topic: The Anti-Crowd Theory in
Political Thought: From Plato to James Madison
June
19:
Topic: The Psycho-Social Aspects of the
Anti-Crowd Theory after the French Revolution:
Hippolyte
Taine, Gabriel Tarde and Gustave Le Bon
June
20:
Topic: The Partial Rehabilitation of
the Political Crowd among Marxist Historians: Eric
Hobsbawm,
E.P. Thompson and George Rude
June
21:
Topic: The De-politicization of the
Crowd in American Liberal and European Postmodern
Thought:
Walter Lippmann to Hannah Arendt and Guy Debord to Jurgan Habermas
June
22:
Topic: The Return of the Political
Crowd in the Global South Today: Mahatma Gandhi,
Antonio
Negri and James Scott
2)
Critical Plant Studies:
Philosophy, Science, Culture (Faculty: Michael Marder) June 24 – June
29, 2013
In
June 2009, the British media broke a sensational news story based upon a
research article published in the journal Ecology
Letters by Richard Karban, an entomologist from the
University
of
California
,
Davis
and his colleague Kaori Shiojiri of
Kyoto
University
,
Otsu
. The BBC and The
Telegraph were the first to report that sagebrush shrubs are capable
of self-recognition and, sensitive to the difference between their
genetically identical neighboring clones and unrelated plants, emit
biochemical messages warning their kin of herbivore attacks. The seemingly
outlandish idea of “talking plants,” made popular in the second
installment of The Lord of the Rings
trilogy, finally received a strong scientific backing.
Truth
be told, the revolution in plant sciences did not start only three years
ago. At least over the last three decades, botanists, cell biologists, and
ecologists have made exciting discoveries of the plants’ surprising
capacities to communicate, to perceive changes in their surroundings, and
to behave in a deliberate and intelligent fashion. It would be an
understatement to note that these findings are debatable. The
controversies, now raging in the scientific community, amount to a
veritable clash between the dominant view of the plant as a machine and an
alternative paradigm of plants as intelligent beings, with their own form
of consciousness.
Philosophers,
for their part, have remained largely silent on the subject of plant
intelligence. Although treatises on animals have been cropping up with
remarkable frequency of late, the preoccupations of most philosophers lie
far from the realities of rooted organisms, in much more ethereal realms
of metaphysics and epistemology. But what if philosophical engagement with
the world of plants could shed light on these seemingly unrelated themes
and domains at the heart of the discipline? And what if the figure of the
plant (perhaps a ghostly figure but an ever-present one nonetheless) has
kept growing and quietly thriving on the margins of virtually all the
great systems of thought in the Western tradition?
The goal of Critical Plant Studies is to initiate, together with students, an
interdisciplinary dialogue, whereby philosophy, science, and the arts
would learn from one another to think about, imagine, and describe, the
life of plants with critical awareness, conceptual rigor, and ethical
sensitivity.
To accomplish our goal, we will
first consider how plants have been understood in the history of Western
thought, up until the twentieth century. Second, we will try to
re-conceptualize them not as objects of theoretical study or practical
utility but as subjects in their own right, with a temporality, freedom,
and wisdom of their own. Third, we will draw ethical and political
implications from our reconsideration of plant life, in an effort to come
up with an alternative framework for our engagement with these living
beings. Some of the sessions will be paired with artworks meant to
exemplify our changing relation to plants.
Workshop
Schedule
June
24
Topic: What is a plant? The promises and limits of “plant ontology”
Readings: Julien la Mettrie, Man,
a Plant; Daniel Chamovitz, “Do Plants Think?”; Michael Marder,
“Of Plants, and Other Secrets”
Artists: Mathilde Roussel and
Heidi Norton
June
25
Topic: Metaphysical approaches to plants. The West’s construction of the
vegetal
Readings
:
Aristotle, De anima (selections)
and De plantis (attributed,
selections); Hegel, Philosophy of
Nature (selections)
Artists: Jan van Huysum, Vincent
Van Gogh, and Claude Monet
June
26
Topic: Plant existence. The time
and freedom of plants
Readings
:
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment (selections);
Martin Heidegger, Being and Time,
selections and What is Called
Thinking? (selections); Monika Bakke, “Art for plants’ sake?”
Artists: Robert Mapplethorpe and
B. Wurtz
June
27
Topic: Plant existence,
continued. The wisdom of plants
Readings: Michael Marder,
“Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant
intelligence”; Anthony Trewavas, “Aspects of plant intelligence”;
Richard Karban, “Plant behavior and communication”; Friedrich
Nietzsche, selected aphorisms on plants; Novalis, selected aphorisms on
plants
June
28
Topic: The ethics and politics
of plant life
Readings: Michael Marder,
“Resist like a plant!”, “If peas can talk, should we eat them?”,
“Is plant liberation on the menu?”, “The time is ripe for plant
rights”; Swiss Federal Bioethics Commission Report, “The dignity of
the living in relation to plants”; Christopher Stone, “Should trees
have standing?”
June
29
Topic: When philosophy (love of
wisdom) is phytophilia (love of
plants)…The time for storytelling.
3)
Perpetual Peace: The Genealogy of an Idea and its
Impact on Contemporary Thought (Faculty: Patrícia Vieira) June 24 –
June 29, 2013
In
this seminar, we will explore the religious, philosophical, political and
literary impact of the utopian ideal of perpetual peace from Classical
Antiquity to the present day and consider its applications to politics and
the arts. First, we will uncover the theological and philosophical
underpinnings of Immanuel Kant’s notion of “perpetual peace,” going
back to the writings of Theocritus, Virgil, Ovid, Plato, The
Bible, Saint Augustine and religious missionaries to the Americas, who
believed that the promised Kingdom of Christ of earth would emerge in the
New World. Second, we will discuss the European utopian tradition that
emerged during the Renaissance with Thomas More, Tommaso Campanella and
Francis Bacon.
We
will then turn to the formulation of the notion of perpetual peace, which
stands at the confluence of
Europe
’s Greco-Roman ideal of the Golden Age and of the Judeo-Christian notion
of an Earthly Paradise. We will read in this context Charles-Irenée
Castel de Saint Pierre’s A Project for Setting an Everlasting Peace in Europe, Jean-Jacques
Rousseau’s Project for a Perpetual
Peace, Immanuel Kant’s Perpetual
Peace: A Philosophical Sketch and Jeremy Bentham’s A Plan for an Universal and Perpetual Peace
In
the final section of the seminar we will take a closer look at the
secularized notion of perpetual peace and its use in political discourse
and practices. What can a multipolar world comprised of distinct power
blocks learn from the vision of universal peace? How can the contemporary
multicultural world reaffirm its promise of peace and good governance on a
global scale? And can this promise become not only a normative ideal but
also a concrete blueprint for the new world order, so desperately needed
today?We will assess the relevance of perpetual peace to global governance
and its influence in the Charter of
the United Nations. Further, we will see how this notion has been
adopted and transformed by thinkers such as Hannah Arendt, Jürgen
Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Finally, we will address the impact of the
ideal of perpetual peace in literature, film and in ecology with Aldous
Huxley’s novel
Island
and James Cameron’s film Avatar.
Workshop Schedule:
June 24
Topic:
Introduction & The Classical
Golden Age
Readings
:
Theocritus, Virgil and Ovid (selections)
June 25
Topic:
Eden
, Apocalypse and Messianism
Readings:
Genesis and Book of Revelation (selections), Saint Augustin’s The
City of God (selections), Selected writings by New World Missionaries
June 26
Topic:
From
Arcadia
and
Eden
to Utopia
Readings
:
Plato’s Republic, Timeus and Critias (selections);
Thomas More’s Utopia
(selections); Tommaso Campanella’s The
City of the Sun (selections); Francis Bacon’s New
Atlantis
June 27
Topic:
Perpetual Peace as an Enlightenment
Ideal
Readings
:
Charles-Irenée Castel de Saint Pierre’s A
Project for Setting an Everlasting Peace in Europe; Jean-Jacques
Rousseau’s Project for a Perpetual
Peace; Immanuel Kant’s Perpetual
Peace: A Philosophical Sketch; Jeremy Bentham’s A
Plan for an Universal and Perpetual Peace
June 28
Topic:
The Aftermath of Perpetual
Peace: Philosophy and Politics
Readings
: Charter of the United Nations; Hannah Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (selections); Jürgen
Habermas’s “Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace: At Two Hundred Years'
Historical Remove”; Jacques Derrida’s “Hostipitality”
June 29
Topic:
The Aftermath of Perpetual
Peace: Literature, Cinema and Ecology
Reading
& Film: Aldous Huxley’s
Island
; James Cameron’s Avatar
4)
Translation, Comparatism and the Vernacularin the
Context of Postcolonial Studies
(Faculty:
S. Shankar) July 1 – July 6, 2013
This
course makes an intervention in postcolonial studies through three linked
themes: the vernacular, translation,
and comparatism. It explores the
vernacular as a critical category capable of drawing attention to
disregarded aspects of postcolonial societies. It approaches translation
from the vantage point of theory (as the subject of metadiscursive
rumination) and of practice (as the painstaking transference of a text
from one language to another or, more generally, from one medium to
another). It approaches comparatism
theoretically, exploring the philosophical arguments that have been made
for and against comparatism. How is it possible to engage in an act of
cross-cultural comparison without subjecting one side to the dominant
ideas of the other? Is comparison conceivable without an underlying
universalist foundation? Such are some of the vexing questions at the
heart of the modern project of comparatism. As these questions only begin
to suggest, translation and comparatism are intimately linked topics. An
act of translation is an act of comparison; and comparatism all too often
depends on translation. Together they are indispensable tools for the
exploration of the vernacular in postcolonial contexts.
This
course, then, is an introduction to recent vital debates in postcolonial
studies. The texts we will read mostly pertain to literary and cultural
theory or to philosophy but have been selected so as to enable discussion
across fields, schools of thought and periods. While the focus of the
course is on postcolonialism, some readings that do not speak directly to
the postcolonial situation have been included because of their influential
nature. At the end of the course, the participants will have a rich
understanding of the vernacular, translation and comparatism as they
pertain to the study of postcolonial societies. Throughout, the course
will aim to generate avenues of inquiry and methods of research in a
manner that is of practical use to the course participants.
Workshop Schedule:
July 1
Topic:
Introduction: Postcolonial Theory
and the Vernacular
Readings
:
S. Shankar, Flesh and Fish Blood
(first three chapters); Ania Loomba, from Colonialism/Postcolonialism
July 2
Topic:
The Vernacular: Limits,
Opportunities, and Comparisons
Readings:
Linda Tuhiwai Smith, from Decolonizing
Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples; Sheldon Pollock,
“Cosmopolitan and Vernacular in History”; Francesca Orsini, “India
in the Mirror of World Fiction”;Kwame Anthony Appiah, from Cosmopolitanism;
Martha Nussbaum, “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism”; Dipesh Chakraborty,
from Provincializing Europe
July 3
Topic:
Translation Theory
Readings
:
Walter Benjamin, “The Task of the Translator”; Roman Jakobson, “On
Linguistic Aspects of Translation”; Lori Chamberlain, “Gender and the
Metaphorics of Translation”;
Lawrence
Venuti, “Translation, Community, Utopia”; Jacques Derrida, “The
Towers of
Babel
”
July 4
Topic:
Translation in a Postcolonial
Context
Readings
:
Eric Cheyfitz, from The Poetics of
Imperialism; Tejaswini Niranjana, from Siting
Translation; Edward Said, “Embargoed Literature”; Gayatri Spivak,
“The Politics of Translation”; S. Shankar, “The ‘Problem’ of
Translation” (ch. 4 of Flesh and
Fish Blood)
July 5
Topic:
Comparatism: Methods and
Philosophical Debates
Readings
:
R. Radhakrishnan, “Why Compare?”; Rey Chow
“The Old/New Question of Comparison in Literary Studies”;
Robert Stam and Ella Shohat, “Transnationalizing Comparison: The Uses
and Abuses of Cross-Cultural Analogy”; Mary Layoun, “Endings and
Beginnings: Reimagining the Tasks and Spaces of Comparison”; Ania Loomba,
“Race and the Possibilities of Comparative Critique”
July 6
Topic:
Comparatism as Materialist Critique
/ Concluding Thoughts
Readings:
Chandra Talpade Mohanty “‘Under Western Eyes’ Revisited”;Gayatri
Spivak, “Rethinking Comparativism”; Pheng Cheah, “The Material World
of Comparison”; S. Shankar, “Postcolonialism andComparatism” (ch. 5
of Flesh and Fish Blood)
5)
Anima, Animation and Action (Faculty: Arjun
Appadurai & Gabika Bockaj) July 8 – July 13, 2013
This module explores
how ideas of soul and persona underlie different conceptions of humanity
and sociality. Recent approaches to this topic have cast new light on the
man/machine boundary. These approaches lay the foundation for a new
framework in which to study the ideas of intention, agency, and
interaction in social life, recognizing that humans, animals and machines
cohabit a shared social world.
The background to this
module is Appadurai’s own 1986 book, The
Social Life of Things, which
outlined a new comparative
approach to commodities, combining the views of Marx and Marcel Mauss,
each of whom emphasized the ways in which material things could take on
magical form in social transactions between human beings. This point of
view has been considerably expanded by Bruno Latour, who, in a series of
writings over the last two decades, has developed a major theory called
Actor Network Theory, which provides an alternative foundation for
sociology, by placing a primary emphasis on the agency of objects and
their capacity to act on their own, once they have been manufactured and
animated by technical energies and protocols. Among these works is
Latour’s seminal essay called “Where Are The Missing Masses”, his
books called We Have Never Been
Modern (1993)
and Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory
(2005). More recently, political
theorists, such as Jane Bennett, have been exploring the implications of
material and technological forces to shape complex problems of democracy,
power and collective life (Bennett, Vibrant
Matter: A Political Ecology of Things,
2010) and critics of visual culture have begun to ask, following W.J.T.
Mitchell, What Do Pictures Want: The
Lives and Loves of Images (1998).
We will consider this
variety of readings in regard to the problem of animation, agency and
sociality by drawing on the foundational ideas of Aristotle on the soul in
his classic work De Anima,
Hannah Arendt’s conception of action as outlined in The
Human Condition (1958), and Gilles Deleuze’s ideas about the desiring machine and the
assemblage (Deleuze and Guattari, A
Thousand Plateaus, 1987).
ORGANISATIONAL DETAILS
Study
material will be made available to the participants after their
registration; the participants are expected to have gone through the
material before the commencement of the Course. Each participant is
required to maintain a day-to-day critical account of the sessions in an
academic diary which will be submitted to the director of the program at
the end. In addition, each participant is required to make at least one
formal presentation. Both faculty and participants are expected to stay
together in the same venue for greater interaction and exchange between
them.
PARTICIPATION CRITERIA
Participation
in the Course is mainly open to scholars in the humanities and social
sciences, preferably those working toward research degree, but
post-graduate students and post-doctoral scholars in these disciplines and
scholars from the disciplines outside the humanities and social sciences
interested in inter-disciplinary studies can also apply. Maximum number of
participants to be selected is 35.
REGISTRATION FEE
Each
participant is required to pay a registration fee of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the Forum on Contemporary
Theory through a bank draft drawn on a bank in
Baroda
. The registration fee is non-refundable. The fee will take care of
his/her board and lodging, cost of course material and other related
expenses. The participants will not be paid by the organizers for their
travel.
DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION
The
last date for receiving application for participation is 31
March, 2013. The application may be sent to Director, Centre for
Contemporary Theory,
Baroda
. Selection for participation will be made by April 5, 2013. Selected candidates are required to send the bank
draft favoring Forum on Contemporary Theory before April 15, 2013. Course material will be mailed only after receiving the
registration fee.
CORE FACULTY
a)
Dilip
Gaonkar
is an Associate Professor in Rhetoric and Public Culture and the Director
of Center for Global Culture and Communication at
Northwestern
University
. He is also the Director of Center for Transcultural Studies, an
independent scholarly research network concerned with global issues. He
was closely associated with the journal, Public
Culture, serving as the Executive Editor (2000-2009) and as Editor
(2009-2011). Gaonkar has two
sets of scholarly interests: rhetoric as an intellectual tradition, both
its ancient roots and its contemporary mutations; and, global modernities
and their impact on the political. He
has published numerous essays on rhetoric, including “The Idea of
Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science” that was published along with ten
critical responses to the essay in a book, Rhetorical
Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science,
edited by Alan G. Gross and William Keith (1996).
Gaonkar has edited a series books on global cultural politics: Globaizing
American Studies (with Brian Edwards, 2010), Alternative Modernities (2001), and Disciplinarity and Dissent in Cultural Studies (1995).
He has also edited several special issues of journals: Laclau’s
On Populist Reason (with Robert Hariman, for Cultural
Studies, 2012), Cultures of
Democracy (for Public Culture,
2007), Commitments in a
Post-Foundational World (with Keith Topper, 2005), Technologies
of Public Persuasion (with Elizabeth Povinelli, 2003), and New
Imaginaries (with Benjamin Lee, 2002).
He is currently working on a book manuscript on Modernity,
Democracy and the Politics of Disorder.
b)
Michael Marder is IKERBASQUE Research Professor of Philosophy
at the University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz. He is the author
of books and numerous articles
in phenomenology, political philosophy, and environmental thought. He is
an editorial associate of the journal Telos and
the editor of book series Political Theory and Contemporary Philosophy at
Bloomsbury
; Critical Plant Studies at Rodopi; and the co-editor of Palgrave Studies
in Postmetaphysical Thought. His
most recent monograph is Plant-Thinking:
A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. His website is www.michaelmarder.org.
c)
Patrícia
Vieira
teaches at the Department of Spanish & Portuguese, the Comparative
Literature and the Film and Media Studies programs of
Georgetown
University
. She is the author of Seeing
Politics Otherwise: Vision in Latin American and Iberian Fiction (
Toronto
:
University
of
Toronto Press
, 2011); Portuguese
Film 1930-1960. The Staging of the
New
State
Regime (
Lisbon
: Colibri, 2011; forthcoming with Bloomsbury Press in 2013); and co-editor
of Existential Utopia:
New Perspectives on Utopian Thought (
New York
and
London
: Continuum, 2011).
d)
S. Shankar is
Professor of English and the former Director of the Center for South Asian
Studies at the
University
of
Hawaii
, Manoa. He is a novelist, critic, and translator whose work has appeared
in a wide variety of venues. His novels A Map of Where I Live and
No End to the Journey appeared in 1997 and 2005 respectively (a
Spanish translation of the latter has since appeared); he has also
translated two works from Tamil into English: the full-length Tamil play Water!
and the
Krishna
devotional “Alaipaayuthey.” Shankar’s critical books are Textual
Traffic: Colonialism, Modernity, and the Economy of the Text (SUNY
Press, 2001) and Flesh and Fish Blood: Translation, Postcolonialism,
and the Vernacular (2012, U of California P;
South Asia
edition from Orient Blackswan). He is also co-editor of the widely adopted
anthology Crossing into America: The New Literature of Immigration (New
Press, 2003). Shankar’s scholarly articles, poems, reviews, and literary
essays have appeared in such academic journals and popular venues as PMLA,
Cultural Critique, Tin House,
Massachusetts
Review, Outlook, The Hindu, Pioneer, Village Voice, and The Nation.
He received his graduate degrees from
Madras
University
and the
University
of
Texas
,
Austin
.
e)
Arjun
Appadurai is the Goddard Professor of Media, Culture,
and Communication at
New York
University
. He is a prominent contemporary social-cultural anthropologist, having
formerly served as Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs
at The New School in NYC. He has held various professorial chairs and
visiting appointments at the
University
of
Pennsylvania
,
University
of
Chicago
,
Yale
University
, and The New School University. In addition, he is a founding editor of Public
Culture, one of the most influential cross-disciplinary journals, and
has served on several scholarly and advisory bodies in the
United States
, Latin America, Europe and
India
. Dr. Appadurai’s books include Fear of Small Numbers (Duke UP,
2006), Globalization (Duke UP, 2001), Modernity at Large (U.
Minnesota, 1996), The Social Life of Things (Cambridge UP, 1986),
and Worship and Conflict Under Colonial Rule: A South Indian Case (Cambridge
UP, 1981). The nature and significance of his contributions throughout his
academic career have earned him the reputation as a leading figure in his
fields.
f)
Gabika
Bockaj
is a doctoral student in Anthropology at the
Johns
Hopkins
University
,
Baltimore
.
ATTENDANCE
The participants are required to attend
all the sessions and to stay until the end of the program in order to get
the certificate of participation.
APPLICATION
FORMAT
The following format may be used for
the application:
Name
Gender
Address
(including telephone no. and email ID)
Institutional
Affiliation
Date
of Birth
Department
Teaching
Experience (indicate number of years also)
Academic
Qualifications
Areas
of Research and Teaching
Publications,
if any
Specific
Research Topics, if any
Whether
registered for Research Degree?
Whether
participated in any Course organized by the Forum? If participated, when?
A
brief statement (200 words) about what you expect to gain from the Course
Name
and Addresses of two Referees
Signature
Date
ADDRESS
FOR CORRESPONDENCE
Prafulla
C. Kar
Director, Centre for Contemporary
Theory
C-304 Siddhi Vinayak Complex
Behind Vadodara Railway Station (Alkapuri
Side)
Faramji
Road
, Vadodara – 390007
Tel: 0265-2320870
Email: prafullakar@gmail.com
Website: www.fctworld.org
Sripad
Bhat
Local Coordinator
Department of English
Goa
University
Email: sripad@unigoa.ac.in
Kiran
Budkuley
Chair,
Department of English
Goa
University
Email: kiran.budkuley@unigoa.ac.in